You are viewing [info]jsridler's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Your Own Henry Miller 100

  • Aug. 13th, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Throwing Star
Some time ago, I read an article online about Henry Miller. The article included a list of 100 books that Miller believed every writer should read. It was an eclectic collection of non fiction and literature, if I remember, and a very cool point of reference from Miller.

I think examining what you read and why has value. The old saw about the unexamined life not being worth living and all that jazz. So after reading that list, I wondered what 100 books I would consider being important to my own writing life. I did this maybe a year ago, and it was a pretty eye opening experience. It included comic books, history, as well as fiction both high brow and low ball. I told myself that I would be dead honest about my influence, no fudging and ignoring my illiterate teenage years, no pretending I didn't enjoy Timothy Zahn's Heir to the Empire Star Wars series as much as Jim Thompson's The Grifters. I learned that SF really doesn't thrill me anymore, nor much of celebrated horror writers. But I dug Herman Hesse and Joe Lansdale.

I'm thinking about doing this again. I think such lists should be subject to change, not written in stone. I won't post the whole list or anything, just my thoughts on what I find. If you're interested in doing this (you know, all five of you who read this timesuck LJ), here are some ground rules I used so that the list becomes somewhat manageable. I think Justin Howe came up with some of these, too:

1. If you've read more than five works by an author, you can just list the author's "Collect Work" (Collected works of Shakespeare, Collected works of Stephen King). We get the point. You dig this writer and their oeuvre. Maybe highlight the work that meant the most to you.
2. For comic books, just list the title: Amazing Spider Man, Detective Comics, The Tick, etc.
3. For short story writers, list the collection/anthology that had the stories you loved.
4. Be absolutely honest: no listing of stuff that you think will impress a college English professor or your writing group. For this list to be of value at all, it has to be rooted in honesty. If you think there is a bunch of stuff missing from your literary background, cool, go make a list of stuff you should read. But that is a different list
5. Read and comment on the list, what you discovered, if anything.
6. If you want, report back on what you find. But if you post a list, shove it behind a cut since no one likes MASSIVE LJ LISTS poking them in the eye.

Ok, troops, you have a week to complete your mission. Ready . . . Steady . . . SHANG-GO!

JSR

 

Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]unnamed_horror wrote:
Aug. 13th, 2008 07:23 pm (UTC)
an examined life
Very interesting proposition. And it dovetails with a TNEO conversation that I participated in -- it was a moderated Q&A about genre works, and I happened to be in the horror ghetto. Questions like "first book", "best book", "favorite book", "most recently read", "best entre to the genre if given to a friend" type question. etc. it's amazing to me the list I came up with. As someone trying to get through the "100 best" SF and F (based on those internet lists), I find myself really questioning why these works are considered great or favorites, when I've wanted to throw many of them across the room. But, the commitment to reading something for its value is not the same as my fave/influential books list. Must think on this. Thanks for making my head hurt.
[info]jsridler wrote:
Aug. 13th, 2008 07:57 pm (UTC)
Re: an examined life
Hey JoAnn,

Happy to, uh, help? I find those MUST READ lists interesting, sometimes useful, but just as critical is understanding how and why we love what we love. Not to defend or justify (though that is fun over a few beers), but to get a handle on our own appreciations, desires and interests in fiction. Hence why I said BE HONEST. Does you no good to lie about stuff you haven't read, even if ticks the box for some unknown external validator.

I too have thrown many classics across the room, but found a lot to be wicked cool (Frankenstein, Dr. Jeckell and Mr Hyde, Phantastes).

JSR
[info]glamberson wrote:
Aug. 13th, 2008 07:41 pm (UTC)
Ah, Hesse!
[info]jsridler wrote:
Aug. 13th, 2008 07:58 pm (UTC)
Yup, Steppenwolfe was kick-ass. Have also liked some of his essays. Glass Bead Game, though . . . ugh. Might give it a try again sometime, but sorta outside my zone.

JSR
[info]boonofdoom wrote:
Aug. 14th, 2008 01:18 am (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I still haven't got the full 100 from my last Ridler-instigated attempt at this Henry Miller thing...
[info]jsridler wrote:
Aug. 14th, 2008 02:31 am (UTC)
Hail, Deluca, Hail!

Then get on it, amigo. I would very much dig your thoughts on your own reading, from your Borges bonanza to your reading of the Never Ending Story.

Which, you know, ended. THEN HAD A SEQUEL!

JSR
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Throwing Star
[info]jsridler
jsridler

Latest Month

February 2012
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Teresa Jones